SpokenTruth said:
1). These are not editorials but documented accounts. If they are directly quoting Trump saying something racist, the bias nature of the reporting agency is irrelevant. Kind of makes me think you didn't click either of them. 2). Because that's not the point of the thread. I was not making a case for or against impeachment. I laid out the details of what impeachment is, why he's being impeached, how it works, a timeline and who the players involved are. I've made my case in the official US Politics thread many times. But you have reminded me of a couple of updates I need to make. Now that we are past the inquiry phase, the defense side has shifted more towards Trump and Zalenskky's statements. I'll need to add them. |
You bothered to lay out the defense
But you don't think the evidence should be laid out too (spoiler: there is none)







