By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpokenTruth said:
thegamerpad said:

1) I don't know if I'd go around claiming VOX or the Atlantic as some sort of unbiased sources.


You know what I found extremely concerning and interesting though, is that you created this thread and put a ton of detail and hard work into...you even included what the defense is (with a noticeable slant in your explanation) 2). but at NO point did you actually lay out the evidence.   How can you put all that time and work in it and not show the evidence? 

1). These are not editorials but documented accounts.  If they are directly quoting Trump saying something racist, the bias nature of the reporting agency is irrelevant.  Kind of makes me think you didn't click either of them.

2). Because that's not the point of the thread.  I was not making a case for or against impeachment.  I laid out the details of what impeachment is, why he's being impeached, how it works, a timeline and who the players involved are. I've made my case in the official US Politics thread many times.

But you have reminded me of a couple of updates I need to make.  Now that we are past the inquiry phase, the defense side has shifted more towards Trump and Zalenskky's statements.  I'll need to add them.

You bothered to lay out the defense

But you don't think the evidence should be laid out too (spoiler: there is none)