By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
goopy20 said:
Conina said:

No, you are wrong again!

Battlefield 4:

MGS 5:

And please don't always write the GPU names wrong. "GTX" is a prefix for the number since a decade, not a suffix!

GTX 660, not 660 GTX

Look, minimum or recommended requirements, it makes no difference. At this time there is no multiplatform game out there that recommends a RTX 2xxx and next year there will be. If people want to play those games in 720p without ray tracing and the lowest settings, then yes you're probably not going to need that. But for any self respecting pc gamer that wants to experience the big AAA titles in all of its full ray tracing glory, as god and the developers intended those games to be played, you WILL need to upgrade if you currently gaming on a mainstream gaming pc. 

Again, we will also have to wait and see how MS and Sony will support these next gen consoles and how quickly they will leave current gen behind. Sony will probably not drop support for the ps4 right away. However, if MS is smart they would just forget about the Xone and launch with a bunch of games that push the new Xbox to its limits. Personally, I think that's the only way they can get a foothold in next gen, but I guess we have to wait and see. 

Except that from some reports on front page Sony said the unannounced titles are for PS5 only and MS said that they will have crossgen titles for the time being.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."