Imaginedvl said:
I agree with that. If a console buyer is really caring (and basing his/her choice) on how much power or heat the machine will generate, this person is part of minority. Of course console makers are trying to do their best to deliver the most powerful/green/etc machines out of their factories but at the end; buyers are really caring about having something nice, playing the good majority of games out there, plug and play and ready to go. Another factor are exclusives for a lot of people; While I'm using the Xbox as main console; I know that I bought the Play Station Four because of Horizon Dawn and I will buy the next one as soon as the next game is out :) I did not care a minute about the look, the power consumption, green stuff or even the specifications... |
Yep, games, price and performance would probably be the most common order of priority for most of the general consumer of consoles.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







