By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mnementh said:
SammyGiireal said:

Had the Switch been a Home console it would have failed. The Switch is my favorite system because of its portability and most of the market sees it as such. Nintendo left the home console bussiness. 

Does that really matter? Say, the PS6 drops BluRay and only banks on SSDs. You could say then Sony has left the optical disc drive console market, which they started their gaming enterprise on. Or an easier example: with PSVR, you might say Sony is leaving the home console market to enter the VR console market.

But would it matter? In the end all that counts is, they have a system which runs games and you want to play said games. Nothing else matters.

In the historic scheme of things, yes, it matters. Nintendo had been a home console manufacturer since the mid 80s, and they remained so even after struggles with the N64 and GC all the while their portable bussiness kept booming.

After the Wii U, and Sony's domiantion in this gen on the home console front, Nintendo made a smart decision to consolidate both of their efforts into one portable system, that happens to have the option to be played on a full TV screen. 

The Switch Lite is proof that this is indeed a portable first. If it was the other way we would have had a Switch Home Console only version with powered up specs instead of the Lite. They are still competing directly against Sony and MS, after all the Switch is a 300 hundred dollar device with added costs in carrying case and game easily a near 400 dollar investment at the start (for the regular model) it is just they went to the bussiness side of things that they have always excelled at (portables), the nature of the Switch makes also a perfect companion console, so Ninty is also getting sales from current PS4 and X1 owners.