By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer on 13 December 2019
Edit Thread
Pemalite said:
HollyGamer said:
12 teraflop confirmed, LOL. in GCN number Navi teraflop are equal to 1,4 times of GCN performance 12X 1.4 = 16.8 teraflop of GCN from Xbox One = 16.8/1.3= 12.9 times more powerful than Xbox One.

Flops is not everything when it comes final look of games, but it's there to measure theoretically . So it's a humongous improvement.

So we still need to confirmed PS5 performance before we close this nthread.

False.
Otherwise the Radeon RX5500 XT with it's 8.6-10.1 Teraflops of power would have been able to decisively beat the Radeon RX 590 with it's 6.7-7.1 Teraflops of power.

Plus you are asserting that Navi's Teraflops are 1.4x better than GCN's meaning the RX 5500 should be the equivalent of 9.38-9.94 Teraflops of the Radeon RX 590, which should see the Radeon RX 5500 XT with a significant performance advantage over the RX 590 and we know THAT didn't happen.

https://www.anandtech.com/show/15206/the-amd-radeon-rx-5500-xt-review

This is why using your flops metrics is an absolute joke, it's absolutely useless.

I agree using pure teraflop metrix is false, but if you have other GPU that prove the other way around then it can be used as benchmark as well, RX 5500 is bad GPU example. You can use RX 5700 or 5700 Xt as example tho. 

You can check this video tho