Shiken said:
Well people who do not like changes and rate it a 5 or a 6 is a valid complaint. Giving a game a zero for no other reason than personal preference is what I am refering to as invalid. Anything below a 5 is pretty much just a degree of how unplayable a broken game is. |
On that I totally agree, I can't think of a mainline pokemon game being less than 5 or 6 for anyone that is a gamer and not trolling. Sure I wouldn't buy a game I feel is a 6, but at least I can accept someone that loves other Pokemon games being flustered with one entry and venting out with a bad score that perhaps in 1 or 2 months will cool down and rate the game an acceptable 8.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."