By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shiken said:
DonFerrari said:

Well let's say that we can't be sure how much of user review were trolls, but people not liking changes isn't invalid complain.

As long as most customers are happy with the game all is good.

Well people who do not like changes and rate it a 5 or a 6 is a valid complaint.  Giving a game a zero for no other reason than personal preference is what I am refering to as invalid.  Anything below a 5 is pretty much just a degree of how unplayable a broken game is.

On that I totally agree, I can't think of a mainline pokemon game being less than 5 or 6 for anyone that is a gamer and not trolling. Sure I wouldn't buy a game I feel is a 6, but at least I can accept someone that loves other Pokemon games being flustered with one entry and venting out with a bad score that perhaps in 1 or 2 months will cool down and rate the game an acceptable 8.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."