| JWeinCom said: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy This seems to be just your go to thing. The simple fact is he did not say he didn't attack people. He said nope indicating that he was disagreeing with some part of your post. Since the word nope absent of context is vague and unclear, he then provided two more specific statements precisely defining his disagreement. His clarification made it clear that "nope" was not implying that he never attacked people for any reason. But hey, responding to what you wanted him to say is much easier than responding to what was actually said. Of course, I'm probably just nitpicking, because anything that disagrees with you tends to fall into that category. |
Ha I must of have really made you salty if you're coming to the defense of a willfully ignorant liar, jumping on my one potential fallacy while ignoring his many.
Once again you're trying to derail discussion to be about how I don't word my post the way you'd like. We've had this discussion already, it's pointless and a waste of time, so I'm not going to engage further and you're just gonna have to deal with that.
| Chrkeller said: Yep this exactly. Thank you kindly. More specifically: First Dolphin comment: "You attack people over games you haven't played, most of your post about Sw/Sh involves defending Game Freak from criticism. " I said "nope" referring to "defending" Game Freak. And I clarified that I am reserving judgement for when I play the game. He then responded with "quoting" himself: "You attack people over games you haven't played" Note how he intentionally only quoted part of his original statement. He did so to make it appear he said something other than what he originally did. |
Attacking people criticizing Sw/Sh is defending Game Freak and I'm not surprised you'd try to pretend they aren't one in the same. Therefore, even with the nope specifically referring to defending, I think the shortening of my post to be concise and to the point is still accurate.
Regardless, you're still an irrational liar, saying you don't defend games you haven't played despite this whole conversation being a result of your defending.
| Immersiveunreality said: The game still looks like a big improvement over the last one gameplaywise,i do not really mind them cutting into the pokedex if what remains got effort put into it. I also think they do not owe me to make every pokemon accessible forever. |
It's not about being owed, they don't owe us anything and we don't owe them. It's about standards not being upheld and blatant lying.
