Lonely_Dolphin said:
I say you attack people, you say nope, but then immediately admit to attacking people... Yeah I'd stop responding too after that one. xD |
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/169/Strawman-Fallacy
This seems to be just your go to thing. The simple fact is he did not say he didn't attack people. He said nope indicating that he was disagreeing with some part of your post. Since the word nope absent of context is vague and unclear, he then provided two more specific statements precisely defining his disagreement. His clarification made it clear that "nope" was not implying that he never attacked people for any reason.
But hey, responding to what you wanted him to say is much easier than responding to what was actually said. Of course, I'm probably just nitpicking, because anything that disagrees with you tends to fall into that category.
Last edited by JWeinCom - on 14 November 2019
