Azzanation said:
1st) How am i derailing exactly? Please go into more detail. 2nd) You clearly havnt read the posts in this thread. I recommend doing so befor jumping the gun. 3rd) Again, same point as 2nd point. Also how can you discuss what a game is worth a 3 or 6 or 9 if you havnt played it? Please discuss. 4th) You are personally attacking because you clearly dont like me posting my opinion in a open thread. 5th) No one said anything about not discussing review scores. Whinging is a different story. 6th) Can you read my mind? How do you know if i am interested in this game and wont consider buying it in the near future? Seems like you assume and generalise too much here. 7th) Nothing i said was wrong, i actually stand up for games that dont review well and in this case, just because the game didnt score 9s and 10s across the board should not be judged as not a good game nor should people assume without actually playing it, if the game deserves 3s or 10s. Whether you agree or disagree does not concern me one bit. |
1) The thread is about the reviews and scores, not about complaining that people talk about them. So you derailled since your first post.
2) I have read and your assumptions failed you once again. No one said the game is bad because it is below 90 or that they won't accept below 90. Will you then come with some of the excuse you used in another thread that some other site someone said it?
3) The level of rubbish a game needs to be to deserve a 6 much less a 3 is ridiculous and nothing suggest this games deserve it, even more when the meta is 85. Have no idea why you think your response to 3 is somewhat the same to 2.
4) Nope, attacking your points isn't a personal attack. Even though you claimed I haven't read the thread which would be more of an attack than me stating what you have done in similar threads.
5) Yes sure, how many threads have you gone to defend low score against Sony exclusives? I remember 3 or 4.
6) I don't generalize since I'm talking to you not about some unkown mass or entity. Funny enough you haven't said that you are interested in the game or that you'll buy this game. Also I'm still waiting the proof of all the Sony games you claim to have played, but any time I ask for you to show your game tag and trophies you say you don't have to prove you have played the games, and we have to trust you even if you never said a single praise about PS4 or its games.
7) And again no one said this game is bad because some reviewers gave it less than 9, they are exactly saying the very low scores are low because the game is good for all the accounts.
Funny that you complain about people not being allowed to say the game is undeserving of a 6 or below, but you very much defends it without having played as well.
And sure I won't reply back to you, because at this point it is very clear to anyone that you just came to stir problem in the thread and offend fans.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







