By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
JRPGfan said:

Harsh isnt even the right word..... to express how silly that score is, its worse than "harsh".

There has to be some sort of standard for what a review score means, or else the entire score metric is baseless and worthless.
3.5 is the sort of score you give some broken peice of crapy indie game, full of bugs.

All you need to do is watch a trailer or some gameplay and you can tell its not a 3,5 score.
That reivewer should be banned for click bait score giveing.

Also, I disagree that a big budget AAA title can’t be scored a 3.5 because it’s not an indie title or it isn’t buggy. The Order 1886 is a great looking, fully functional and bug free title. I wouldn’t bat an eye at a 3.5 score for it because the things it tries to do well, it fails miserably. I haven’t read the 3.5 DS score and probably never will, but if the reviewer found major flaws with key elements then why can’t it be a 3.5?

Also maybe if you feel this strongly about scores, don’t rely on a review aggregator? Or don’t even look at them. Find a stable of reviewers who share your opinions and bias and score standards and only read their reviews.

Death Stranding Tech Review: The Digital Foundry Verdict

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQEPme0SXtQ

watch this and tell me that Death Stranding is a 3,5 game.

It ooses tender care & love, taken into so many aspects...... and its ahead of basically every game in terms of graphics on the market.
How can you score it that low? you cant.

I'm calling BS on that score.