By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLXVER said:
JRPGfan said:

If his opinion wont go with what the base for review scores is, he shouldnt be allowed on metacritic.
He obviously goes against what is the normal for a review.

He can be a reviewer thats just not on metacritic then, they should have standards higher than this.
I dont see why metacritic should allow Trolls to review and contribute towards metascore.

Well what do you consider important in a review? What guidelines should everyone follow?

If you hate a game you have to give it at least a 5 if it has great graphics?

Cant go over an 8 if the music is not good?

I do think his personal bias tainted his review, but thats not really hard to see. 

Im sure theres a checklist you have to go through.
How are the graphics? the story? the gameplay? the bugs ect.


Im not a reviewer, but I feel like just "my gut" feeling is I dont like it, so it ll just give it a 35, for click bait, isnt something that should be allowed.
The "its just my opinion man" shouldnt be allowed.

Theres needs to be some formula to follow, that means if things are up to pair, it atleast scores a 50.
Theres just no way to justify a 35 review score for this.