By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PotentHerbs said:
DonFerrari said:

For me it only makes sense to move forward. If gens weren't getting better and games as well I would keep playing old stuff, I wouldn't expend money to play what I would consider worse.

I do have some nostalgia, but I rather they make a remaster/remake so I can play with current visual and gameplay than going back to play PS1 games (even though I loved replaying Soul Reaver and FF IX on PS3 and PS4 - but original version... still I played probably 2 or 3 dozen remakes and remasters that were better than they were on the original because they kept the soul of the game intact just giving the paint cover and polish it needed to look current).

That's the truth. 

I'd love a few remakes for older titles from the PS1/PS2 era. It would do wonders for a few dormant Sony IP's (Syphon Filter, Sly, Jak, Socom, etc).

Jak and Sly had remaster collections on PS3 I loved them (Sly even got a sequel); Syphon Filter I would very much like to play either a RE2 remake style or a new entry.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."