Zkuq said: I'm not seeing online-only anywhere here. That said, even if it's just focused on multiplayer, I doubt I'm going to be interested because of PS+. |
Well if they make it f2p or with sub for the game then it won't need PS+. but then it would be an even worse play imho than being a regular retail release MP only. I will avoid the game anyway as I don't play online. Just posted the new because I haven't seem it before.
BraLoD said: Yeah, they told us this last month. The Last of Us Online will be a separated game. They are going all out with it. I loved the online for the original, but I'm not into online only games, so I might end up passing on it. That should be great for them, though, bring more diversity with a good online experience. Just keep giving us the best single player games and I'll be fine with it. |
I didn't see at the time.
They probably will make much more money. I would say very little people bought TLOU because of MP exclusively (or that would not buy TLOU2 because it lacks MP). So if they do a good game out of this MP that will be extra profit on a similar budget they had planned.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."