Lafiel said:
the point of "multiple SSDs are faster than 1!" isn't a particularly insightful or relevant one in my opinion |
Who cares?
There are PCI-E 16x drives that don't use multiple nvme drives that use MLC or SLC NAND (With some newer ones opting for TLC), they have been around, albeit hard to come by even in enthusiast circles.
I.E.
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/66929/liqid-teases-pcie-4-x16-ssd-32tb-up-24gb-sec/index.html
| DonFerrari said: Sorry Pemalite, I value your knowledge a lot, but you are really going out of your way to not accept defeat. Everybody and Cerny is talking about regular and available to customer solution. If you so much want to make exotic solutions, multiple cards, etc you can get above that. |
Cerny never stated any such thing. - So it's a little disingenuous to imply that he did.
| DonFerrari said: As I said before Cerny wasn't lying (and you were also wrong on the fact that they wouldn't put SSD, then that if they put it would be small because of price, and now that it wouldn't be that fast) but certainly not being full transparent and also hyperbolic. |
There are PCI-E 3.0 x16 drives faster than what the Playstation 5 and Scarlett will have. Evidence has been provided.
Price isn't a factor as Cerny never mentioned any of that, it's that simple.
| DonFerrari said: If their solution was faster than any other common solution available for consumer then he wasn't lying, although if you want to be argumentative just to win you can try and go that solutions for super computers would be much above whatever Sony would use. Still that would be irrelevant, because only the craziest would expect a console costing 500 to be more powerful than anything possible on PCs or supercomputer. You don't need to bring very expensive solutions to say Cerny was lying. |
Cerny made zero mention of the audience/market or even price in question when making his statements.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
