The_Liquid_Laser said:
I'll give you Horizon Zero Dawn, because I forgot about that. And you can count Until Dawn too. Can't count most of the others. Death Stranding is not out yet. Those other games are either not particularly great or are sequels. The Last Guardian and Spider-Man are sequels. Nioh is a Dark Souls clone. Perhaps the main "original" games this generation are the ones that copy Dark Souls. Boy, it's really hard to think of good original PS4 games, isn't it? |
You don't thinking the game is great doesn't discount it being a new game.
Last Guardian isn't a sequel, there are hints that it is in the same universe of the other 2, but gameplay wise it is totally different game. And how the first S-M game made by Insomniac is a sequel? Is that because there were other S-M before or because Sunset Overdrive resembles it? I didn't even gone there and cheat listing God of War as new title because it is totally different than the others and the story have like 1% cross with the past ones.
For you it may be hard, I have no issue over it.
LudicrousSpeed said:
Sales of Sony first party games SHOULD be higher. There are less first party games for consumers to choose from and what, 20 million more consoles for people to buy games for? What exactly do sales have to do with anything I posted, anyway? I said Sony is releasing less games this gen and relying more on third party. These are facts. I don't care what their software sells, I don't care what the metascore is. So you just want to sprout BS using a generic quantity of games, great to know. so I don't think I need to reply back anything else you say in response.
Your metacritic list is irrelevant, but lets analyze it anyway. A brilliant analysis made just to dismiss what you don't like or agree, congratulations.
Again, considering context and logic, Sony should sell a lot of software on PS4. AFAIK it's over 100 million sold. I don't even know what that last part is trying to say. When a company is selling more of their own SW, total and having more high sellers, you can't claim they are relying more on third parties at all. |
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."