By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shikamaru317 said:
Not interested. Sony had damn well better have secretly formed a new first party studio to take over the Uncharted IP since Naughty Dog clearly aren't interested in it anymore. It's the only Naughty Dog IP I care about, and I will be majorly disappointed if Sony just let's the IP sit and rot. Would love a new series of Uncharted games focused on his daughter.

I prefer they keep UC finished and start a new IP even if it is with similar gameplay.

Sony have closed plenty of popular IPs after they finished the story on it.

CuCabeludo said:

With so many good F2P multiplayer games out there. Riot had a deluge of new titles announements recently, with even a LoL built for consoles and mobile. I hope it is at least F2P otherwise it will have no chance.

I doubt a ND online game only would be so irrelevant.

method114 said:
shikamaru317 said:
Not interested. Sony had damn well better have secretly formed a new first party studio to take over the Uncharted IP since Naughty Dog clearly aren't interested in it anymore. It's the only Naughty Dog IP I care about, and I will be majorly disappointed if Sony just let's the IP sit and rot. Would love a new series of Uncharted games focused on his daughter.

IMO they need to give the franchise a rest. I love the uncharted games but I've had enough for years now. Felt the same way about Gears of War but MS just keeps churning them out, same with Halo.

When they do bring it back. Do something new, change it up. Similar to how God of War came back but changed a great deal from the original games.

For me they can rest Uncharted forever (and I love it) and start a new franchise, with new story, but with the same indiana jones feel. I like when Sony good devs bring new IPs.

Ka-pi96 said:
That wouldn't be a new IP though. It would just be a TLOU spinoff.

Twitter say it isn't related to TLOU2, so it may be a new IP they created while planning the MP portion of TLOU2.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."