By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoangNhatAnh said:
DonFerrari said:

Don't keep tab of how many users or threads had that claim, but to pretend they don't exist you know you would be wrong.

It was a possibility only in your mind, but you won't accept you were wrong and that a 240p15fps wouldn't be pretty nor playable.

Isn't Switch capable of being plugged to TV? Aren't smartphones resolution mostly over 1080p? Isn't Switch screen reasonably large for a portable system? So what leads you to believe CASUALs would ignore all that but would flock to purchase Witcher 3 based on your supposed pretty graphics? What type of casual player is this you are painting off? You are ignoring logic just to say you are right.

Since when i said that? I said everyone was fine with it because just a small fraction of the big userbase did complain about it and nothing guarantee that they didn't get the game even with their loud talk lol

If ds resolution is fine for casual, then so is the Switch lol

LOL hope you can tell that to Switch Lite and the japan owners lmao

DS resolution was fine for basically all users, over 10 years ago, Atari as well 30 years ago. What does that have to do with making a 240p15fps port on Switch a success?

Great, so from your answer I understand you know there are people that preach that under 60fps is unacceptable, but they would praise this port, ok, thanks.

Tell what to Japanese owners? They love portables, do you find anything strange on they liking the Lite? Do you think they would buy Witcher 3 240p15fps?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."