HoangNhatAnh said:
Yeah, how many of them? Plenty of threads? How many people was there? 1000 or lower? A massive users or just a few loud talkers - a very small fraction of a very big userbase? Since when i said that i supported that idea? But it is a possibility if they target the casual audience and choose graphic over fps You clearly ignored what i said on purpose. I said casual audience, handheld mode with small screen, just like the phone audience. But yeah, you have to ignore it in order to even support your own argument |
Don't keep tab of how many users or threads had that claim, but to pretend they don't exist you know you would be wrong.
It was a possibility only in your mind, but you won't accept you were wrong and that a 240p15fps wouldn't be pretty nor playable.
Isn't Switch capable of being plugged to TV? Aren't smartphones resolution mostly over 1080p? Isn't Switch screen reasonably large for a portable system? So what leads you to believe CASUALs would ignore all that but would flock to purchase Witcher 3 based on your supposed pretty graphics? What type of casual player is this you are painting off? You are ignoring logic just to say you are right.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."