vivster said:
Don't worry, I don't expect you to actually know what "high quality" is. The word was that the PS4 will use something that's faster than a regular consumer SSD. You will only get that with a small cache or something that's actually high quality. So we'll end up at the 3rd option I haven't considered yet. A dirt cheap SSD that only looks good in comparison to an old console with an HDD. I mean they are already advertising it as if it's a brand new revolution. Because for their audience even the cheapest and slowest SSD will be. |
That would be called a lie since Cerny was very direct on the SSD they are using on PS5 being faster than "anything on the market", not HDD.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







