How bout dat Blizzard!? UPDATE: Blizzard responds with "China isn't involved please believe us!"

[Zoombael]

Lonely_Dolphin said:

Zoombael said:

That was after the Blitzchung ban. You re saying you arnt programmed robots. Yet you mindlessly suggest its a good idea to throw more oil into the fire. You re one of those who believe Blizzard merely banned because the chinese gov. is breathing down their necks. But did they ban the US team for basically doing the same and add sth. extra? Or do US americans dont count?

Do you know the meaning of the word "possible"? Check your english.

And do you plan on boycotting any other business doing business with china? Because doing business in china is doing business with the party. If not then dont bother me ni mire with your trendy hyprocrisy. Or continue not to know when to stop, like the protesters, and the point of no return is reached and the PLA intervenes, cracking down hard on them.

Ah so you'll only try to use context when it's convenient for you. However I didn't suggest anything, I pointed out hypocrisy. If you're gonna take the stance of "upholding rules no excuses" then you can't make excuses to not uphold the rules.

You think not banning them didn't add more fuel to the fire!? If they had been banned it'd give their "just upholding rules" stance credibility rather than further destroy it. Your last 2 sentences in that 1st paragraph don't make sense, the US team wasn't banned, obviously because they have no relation to China.

Ok I looked up the definition of possible, and? Doesn't change what you said, that you admitted to China's possible punishment affecting their decision.

I didn't say anything about boycotting so not gonna address that, especially since I'm still waiting to hear what damages Blitzchung caused that warrant such punishment. Although are you seriously saying the people of Honk Kong should give up on their freedom!? Did I read that right!? If so, Dayum!

I can make "excuses", since its up to Blizzard how to handle a situation. Have never heard the term "house rules". It is their decision how to react. As i said, it seems they exercise liniency, avoid further escalation and... its wrong again. And as i also said, it doesnt matter what they do, it is always wrong in the eyes of some.

You hear or read what you want to hear/read to feed your trendy hyprocrisy. A complex subject such as this isnt really meant to be discussed with irrational, selfrighteous dicks.