MontanaHatchet on 26 June 2008
| TWRoO said: Sigh. This has been posted before, the only reason Nintendo has a score of 0 is because they didn't take part, which to be honest should not have resulted in a score of 0, Greenpeace should have left them out (perhaps mentioning they didn't take part but not giving them a score. Most of it os based on any hazardous materials used in their electronics, so does not taking part mean I should no longer inhale to strongly near my Wii? That said I think Sony are doing pretty good, I think they are the only ones of the three with a recycling policy. |
Of course it's been posted before. Relating to the survey:
"The guide was first started in August 2006 and is now in its eighth edition."
As for Nintendo:
"She said the campaign group had regularly contacted the games firm since 2007 but had not had any response. In the end it had been forced to use information from Nintendo's website, she said."
"That's great, as that must be why they have lost $3.3 bln in 2007 and 2008 on the console."
First off, what a poor contribution to the thread. Second off, the gaming division is the least profitable, right? Read this quote:
"It ranks the top market leaders of the mobile phone, computer, TV and games console markets according to their policies and practices on toxic chemicals and recycling."
