By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SKMBlake said:
DonFerrari said:

By "we" you mean "you" right? As if there isn't enough games coming out that you need all of them to be tailored to your needs right?

Look what the success of PUBG created, a great amount of battle-royale games. I don't want the whole inustry starts to make games like Detroit just because it could potentially sell well.

Are you missing games to play because of that?

I don't like FPS, MP or annual sports games. Still I have plenty of games I like available for me to play. And QD not making this type of game I wouldn't have AAA games of this type to play. So your personal wish on "we don't want this" would affect me negatively. So it isn't "we", it is "you".



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."