PotentHerbs said:
Yup. Seems like PS fans being indifferent comes across as "downplay." The third post in this thread claims Sony fans think the implementation of cross play is bad when this thread barely had a consensus. Where exactly is all the outrage in this thread? I've seen a couple at most and they can be interpreted as indifferent like the majority of Sony fans posting in here. I guess because people can't harp on the lack of cross - play, and whats likely to be a backwards compatibility PS5, we're going to hear a lot more about Sony's "censorship" impacting less than 1% of games. |
We had so many irrelevant stuff that Sony didn't do that became the most important stuff in the universe in this forum. Don't worry they will find another 0,01% of users affected by something and how criminal of Sony for doing it.
Let's just ignore that whatever Sony is doing is because that is the most advantegeous to their business and that Phil PRs is from a place of trying to get a good image of all the damage they have done in the start of the gen.
kirby007 said:
Pardon me? I can name the 5 people who upvoted it if i were allowed |
By all means, Mod already asked to instead of making bland accusations to put the links to the people downplaying.
Mr Puggsly said:
Its console war crap. I genuinely believe people didn't want Sony to cave out of some sort of pride. We can just be glad consumers won over angry forum dwellers. |
We are still waiting for you to name these angry guys.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







