EricHiggin said:
Problem is it's about 7.0 billion too late. The secret person behind these stones hoping for a slow natural decline to eventually make this reality? A future, 'I told ya so'? |
Well that is why I said most. Because unless they were also thinking of killing people and/or controlling birth to keep population reduced the natural course is population growth until stagnation due to cost of living/comfort of having 0-2 child per couple. On most developed countries we are having slow reduction of population along time but the rest of the globe is still growing population. I would say we probably will hit 15 or even 20B people before reduction becomes a natural occurence worldwide.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
