sundin13 said:
First of all, that ignores all of my primary rebuttals to your post. It is little more than a "Look over here" rebuttal which seeks to distract from the conversation instead of confront it. Second, a resounding "Who cares?". Third, pointing to open litigation establishes nothing. Stupid people sue for stupid reasons literally every day. That doesn't mean we should throw out laws. From what I've read, it seems those handling the case agree that this is stupid, so it seems highly unlikely that it will result in anything worth complaining about. |
"First of all, that ignores all of my primary rebuttals to your post."
because its pretty hard to make certain arguments in this context when we can't even agree on something as basic as whether humans can be classified into male and female
I remember when I first watched this video a year or two back, I honestly couldn't believe that someone could be so bold to make such a blatantly stupid claim... but now its actually becoming a dominant ideology, its really is absolutely amazing and now I'm starting understand why that person felt so assured in making that proposition
anyway "are considered within the law under the "Bona Fide Occupational Qualification" provisions of anti-discrimination laws, which essentially state that if a certain quality is fundamental to a position, the employer may discriminate based upon that quality."
how can that apply here when this ideology is claiming that trans women literally are women?
I would have posted this rebuttal before but as I've said we don't even agree on the fundamentals here so...
"Second, a resounding "Who cares?"."
uh ok
"Stupid people sue for stupid reasons literally every day."
fair enough
