the-pi-guy said:
>so you are making a distinction between transwomen and biological females? 1.) In the quoted portion, I'm only showing you what your logic chain was for the above portion. 2.) Might there be instances where you make such a distinction? Sure. A doctor might need certain kinds of information about hormone treatment, surgeries, etc. A lot of the same information they might need for anyone else. For regular day to day life there isn't any kind of need for such a distinction. >you do understand that this is a no no right? No. What is a no no is intentionally misgendering someone just to be a jerk.
>how no one can answer that question directly, all that happens constantly is deflection, its very very revealing I see you assuming what I'll do...
I'll gladly call you a woman. I personally don't care even if you were lying, because some random person's gender doesn't affect me. Either you're being sincere, and it's important to you. Or you're lying and it makes no impact on me.
Now, who's deflecting?
I'm just wondering why you'd think it's relevant.
>according to this ideology would that person not be closer to what you have called as a third sex than a man? Which isn't how it works. |
"For regular day to day life there isn't any kind of need for such a distinction. "
ok
"I see you assuming what I'll do... "
because you've done it several times before but I'm glad to see that you've made the plunge now
"I'll gladly call you a woman. I personally don't care even if you were lying, because some random person's gender doesn't affect me.
Either you're being sincere, and it's important to you.
Or you're lying and it makes no impact on me."
well that's good, you at least appear to authentically accept that biology has no bearing on whether a person is a man or a woman
so in your opinion this guy broke the women's weightlifting record?
https://twitter.com/zubymusic/status/1100348562041462784?lang=en
"Now, who's deflecting? "
this is like me asking if you know how much poop an elephant can expel in one sitting and expecting you to treat that like its a part of the flow of the conversation
the fact that women can be muscular has no bearing on me asking if all that matters is identity
"I'm just wondering why you'd think it's relevant."
because I actually think biology which means the physical reality of the structure of bodies plays a role in whether a person is male or female, i don't think that simply because exceptions exist then that means that categories must be discarded with
whether you guys understand it or not that is the position you are taking, I understand that the idea is to be inclusive, but if there is no limit to it then obviously all you're doing is discarding the categories
now you'll argue that this is not the case, but you have discarded all boundaries when it comes to physical classification of male and female which is absurd
and in addition to that biology and again this means the physical reality of the structure of bodies then has a role to play in gender
