By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JWeinCom on 02 September 2019
Edit Thread
JRPGfan said:
JWeinCom said:

No, let's not turn it around.  Because what you said is that the accuser ALWAYS has the burden of proof.  I am not accusing anyone of anything, so I have no burden of proof to meet.

You are the accuser.  By your own standard you have the burden of proof.  Can you meet that burden?

How the hell do I prove she lied?

I can tell you that she has been said to "fake harrasment"  before for attention (victim card)

She has a history of lying and makeing things up for attention.

She makes her liveing off of it.

watch this ''GAMERGATE''! Zoe Quinn the Fake Victim:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=KOtjR2GWQLQ

I have no idea how you can prove she lied.  But that's not my problem.  You said that the burden of proof lies with the accuser.  That's you. 

So, are you wrong in accusing her, or are you wrong in saying that the accuser always has a burden of proof?  Because you have to be wrong in one of those areas.