sundin13 said:
I have already demonstrated that they in fact do not. As previously stated, contextualizing and expanding on biology is not dismissing biology. It appears we are at am impasse as you are incapable of acknowledging that exceedingly obvious fact.
|
"contextualizing and expanding on biology is not dismissing biology."
so why can't you answer the question? its really amusing that you're saying she's simply expanding the category to be more inclusive of biological abnormalities that occur because biology exists on a spectrum(I understand this to be your reasoning, but its stupid and your refusal to answer gives a indication of how its stupid)
but at the same time you refuse to affirm this position by simply answering yes
" it is hypocritical for any self-identified feminist to use “biology” and “body parts” arguments in their attempts to dismiss trans women"
"No, Trans Women Are NOT ‘Biologically Male""
"lets say I'm a man right now with a massive 10 inch penis, a full beard, rippling muscular body etc etc etc in your opinion do i become a woman by identifying as one now?
if you truly believed the quote was valid, you would just say yes"
it just makes it look like you aren't sincere in your proclamation that you believe this idea to be valid, so go ahead just take the plunge and say yes and you'll affirm your position
