sundin13 said:
A) Those quotes are not dismissing the role of biology. Words mean the things they mean. They don't mean the things they don't mean. That shouldn't need to be explained. B) FOR THE LOVE OF FUCK, YES. I've explained this way too many times for you to still be asking these basic ass questions. While this may be a bit reductive: Sex+Gender=The concepts of maleness+femaleness Presentation and Behavior=Part of the concepts of maleness+femaleness Gender is not defined by sex+anything, gender works alongside sex to construct the concepts of maleness+femaleness. My god, man. Get a hold of yourself. |
" Those quotes are not dismissing the role of biology. Words mean the things they mean. "
"So it is hypocritical for any self-identified feminist to use “biology” and “body parts” arguments in their attempts to dismiss trans women."
ok what does this quote mean to you? lay it out for me
""So who is best fit to decide someone’s sex, and thereby assume their gender identity? Is it society, a doctor, or the individual themselves?""
ok what does this quote mean to you? lay it out for me
""No, Trans Women Are NOT ‘Biologically Male""
ok what does this quote mean to you? lay it out for me
"Sex+Gender=The concepts of maleness+femaleness"
first off male and female are biological categories so right off you were wrong to begin I just didn't bother bringing that up since I wanted to understand your perspective
but regardless you brought these terms into a discussion about gender so obviously I would assume you were using them interchangeably with gender
so for clarity you do not believe gender to have a biological component, correct? edit: you clarified that yes that is the case in the post
I have sympathy for your predicament here because to make this ideology have the appearance of coherency a lot of dancing around with terms is required and that's ok, I have patience and am eager to see where this goes
Last edited by o_O.Q - on 31 August 2019