| vivster said: Funny how the rightwing nutjobs always want to hide behind their "freedoms". Well, I wouldn't expect them to understand how a society works, if they did they wouldn't call for absolute freedom. Freedom of one individual will always infringe on another individual's freedom, so there is literally no way to have absolute freedom. That's why laws exist. That's why laws have to exist or else we would still be in the age of slavery with an all-you-can-rape-buffet for any man who's strong enough. Calling the freedom in the US absolute is nothing but absolutely laughable. How can they have freedom of speech when it infringes on people's freedom to not be killed by right wing maniacs? Speech is powerful and hate speech will inevitably lead to violence. Violence that the US should be very familiar to. I have yet to hear from an antifa extremist to commit mass murder in a nazi concert, or any concert for that matter. Yet mass murder committed by the right seems to flourish. I won't stand for equating deliberately inciting violence against oneself with the mass murder of innocents. And yes, I will always prefer an asshole who wants to be beaten up being beaten up by the people who he wants to be beaten up by over innocents being mowed down indiscriminately. His intent was to be hurt, so instead of going after the antifa, we should be thanking them for so nicely fulfilling this guy's kink. The left doesn't kink-shame after all. |
"Calling the freedom in the US absolute is nothing but absolutely laughable"
good thing that this was not said, but of course some people can't deal in nuance, all they have is absolutes, so the minute someone disagrees with them they have to jump from one absolute to another
the most ironic part of this is that its usually people who claim to b trying to "break down binaries" lol
"How can they have freedom of speech when it infringes on people's freedom to not be killed by right wing maniacs? "
can you give an example of andy ngo or any of the other people in the video expressing incitement for violence?
"I have yet to hear from an antifa extremist to commit mass murder in a nazi concert, or any concert for that matter. Yet mass murder committed by the right seems to flourish."
a sensible way to view the world of course, all of the bad people are in that group over yonder that I disagree with, if we could just deal with them somehow the world would be perfect because my people are good and just
never mind that antifa have communist ideology at their core, an ideology that is responsible for the deaths of millions upon millions of people in the 20th century
"I won't stand for equating deliberately inciting violence against oneself with the mass murder of innocents. And yes, I will always prefer an asshole who wants to be beaten up being beaten up by the people who he wants to be beaten up by over innocents being mowed down indiscriminately."
what does any of this even mean?
"His intent was to be hurt"
evidence?
