Bloodbourne= poor mans Ninja Gaiden and Nioh, prove me wrong.

[The_Liquid_Laser]

Ronster316 said:

The_Liquid_Laser said:

I found Bloodborne to be really disappointing.  It seems like it is trying to be an action game using Dark Souls' mechanics.  Dark Souls' is an awesome RPG, but a terrible pure action game.  Then take all of the choices and freedom away from Dark Souls and you get Bloodborne.

Ninja Gaiden really is an action game.  Never played Nioh.  But if I wanted an action game, then Ninja Gaiden would be a better option.

Last reply before i return to work for a while......... When i finish Bloodborne, i'm going to play Dark Souls 3 next, looks like i'm going to end up doing the souls games in reverse order of their release. in terms of pace, which of the 4 souls games (Demon's souls included too of course) is shall i say.... speedier gameplay and tempo wise? were Demons Souls and Dark Souls 1 the pinnacle of this franchise?

I really loved Demons' Souls when it first came out, but I went back and played it years later and found it to be not nearly as good as the Dark Souls games.  It was a very important stepping stone, but I think all of the Dark Souls games are better.  Dark Souls 1 would probably be the best, but 2 and 3 are almost as good.

Not sure about pacing.  My gut would say Dark Souls 3, but it has been a while since I've played the first two.