By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q on 27 August 2019
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
o_O.Q said:

the fact that a concerned professor had to take his time to write nonsense about how dog parks are dens of rape culture and how spicy food enforces toxic masculinity etc etc etc shows that there is a problem, if you are in denial about that then that's on you

" You just don't like their conclusions."

you misunderstand me, my problem is not with conclusions, if a study had been written on dog parks causing rape culture and this could be coherently, logically demonstrated then i'd have no problem with that

my problem is with a clear lack of coherency and logic coming from people masquerading as "academics" and "rational thinkers"

who wouldn't pause for a second to demean religious people for example for their own lack of coherency and logic

now regardless of whether you believe in the bible or not, I think we can both agree that hypocrisy is bad, the bible has something to say about it:

Matthew 7:5 ESV / 691

You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.

It's not about conclusions?  Then why did you write:

you misunderstand me, i'm simply offering a reason for why he's skeptical of the research conclusions to begin with

he may very well be wrong when it comes to pee values, but what i'm saying is that he's trying to justify a lack of trust in social sciences that is to some extent valid

the social sciences are losing credibility right now and he's right to be wary when it comes to conclusions coming out of that field

Don't pivot now and talk about logic, coherency and hypocrisy.  You said conclusions...twice.

let me repeat myself, the problem is not the conclusions when those conclusions can be rationally verified

but if you pull a conclusion from up your butt that simply sounds like it makes sense because of some idiotic ideology(which is actually happening as I have shown examples of) and then try to fill in the gaps then that's where the problem arises

try to read and understand what i'm saying

people on the left should be trying to stem the tide of this nonsense even if fundamentally it is in line with what they value, because eventually since the foundation isn't solid eventually pieces are going to break off and maybe start hitting you 

that's what has started happening with women, they pushed feminism for a long time and now since they pushed too far feminism which has transformed into "intersectionality" at this point is starting to fuck with them

this has happened because they started with a reasonable goal - equality before the law and that was achieved and so feminism should have seen a decrease in momentum, but instead the core value changed from equality before the law to just equality which does not make sense since men and women are not the same physically or psychologically but of course on the left differences do not exist or are "socially constructed"

it will be interesting to see how big of a pile up this train wreck is going to continue to cause

Last edited by o_O.Q - on 27 August 2019