By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 22 August 2019
Edit Thread
curl-6 said:
DonFerrari said:

And considering Nintendo don't release consoles to lose money, they would either be much weaker than X360 or cost 100 USD more for the same performance. So no price advantage at all.

Yeah that is a fair point, though I think you get probably get 360 level performance at a profit for $300-$350 by end of 2006. I kinda feel it'd be unfair to change the OP at this point.

No problem as I don't think WiiHD costing 50 or even 100 more than X360 would be the key point of it doing worse or not than what you predicted anyway. Just pointed out because Liquid was so damn sure WiiHD would have price advantage against it. MS is much more willing to eat loss on HW than Nintendo.

I would probably prefer a WiiHD than what we had, but for Nintendo I believe Wii was a much better ideia, only if WiiU had done a better job =[



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."