CGI-Quality said:
You originally were positive this had to do with Microsoft. Now it can be ‘reasonably assumed’. It just as easily being reasonably argued against, making that a ‘no shit’ sort of comment. ;) No one was ever told they couldn’t assume it, I’m saying, with my own reasons, that I disagree with said assumption. This type of thing has been going on since before Xbox was even swimming with the others.m |
And positive I remain, I was just using softer language to be polite. I think the difference in our arguments is this. I am saying Microsoft will have factored in to this - that is a 'no shit' comment, to use your terminology.
You're arguing they had nothing to do with it. Even under normal circumstances it would stretch credulity that a company would spend tens of millions (if not more) they dont have to spend on a studio if they didn't have one eye on the competition When that competition is busy buying up studios, even moreso.
Hiku raised an excellent point - Spiderman did incredibly - but incorrectly (or perhaps, incompletely) applied a conclusion. With that game I've no doubt Insomniac did cement their value. They certainly will have commanded a higher price than previously. And Sony who have previously not given strong indications they'd buy Insomniac suddenly after decades found a hell of a lot of money, purchasing a company at a time when it would otherwise make the least fiscal sense.
This type of thing has been going on forever - you're right. Its always had something to do with competition. Just moreso than usual atm.
starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS







