Hiku said:
I don't think that's a contradiction, for a few reasons. I think it's likely they did not want to be purchased before for the price Sony offered them at the time. The price for their acquisition is now likely something beyond the value of their independence. On the subject of PR win, I don't think Sony would need to do anything, until, or unless, the upcoming games from MS's new studios live up to the critical acclaim of Sony's first party studios, and surpasses them. It's subjective, but depending on who you ask, (and Phill Spencer himself said as much) MS are not doing as well in this field as they would have liked, and are still playing catch up. |
You don't react after the other had success, you need to take preventive measures as well. Because if they wait MS to succeed then they will do what MS done this gen, lose an entire gen to react only on the next.
And in this case Sony isn't making a blind bet.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."