Papa Phil: "Xbox has to mean quality games"

[DonFerrari]

LudicrousSpeed said:

DonFerrari said:

So the question on if it's MP focused or SP isn't dependent on the focus of the dev or most players but yourself? That makes any comparison pointless, since you can as you did put Sony games as MP and MS as SP.

It is evidence that SP isn't the focus of the games MS release and invest heavily on.

I already said it’s a pointless debate because it’s subjective. You can’t factually state one way or the other what the focus of the devs were.  You didn’t make the game. I didn’t make the game. I merely listed the games MS has provided me and went in depth about the SP/MP components. 

Again, what on that list is wrong? Where is it “inflated”? I highly doubt you’ve played a majority of the games on that list, but please explain how there is a clear MP focus in a game like Crackdown 3 or State of Decay 2 or Horizon 4.

And I didn’t factually say anything about a Sony game being MP focused. I simply stated that in some people’s opinion, a game like Uncharted 4 or LoU are MP titles and they don’t even touch the SP. 

I listed the games MS has released lately. There’s no huge focus on MP at the expense of SP in any of them. Feel free to explain how it’s wrong, it would be a funny read.

The list is inflated because you put games that majority of players go for the MP as if they were SP focused because you played more of the SP or because they could be enjoyed playing SP only. That is why I said that even CoD could be played as SP only for almost all of the games. Very few in percentage of current games have SP or MP only, most have both. But it is clear to see where the focus come.

GTS have a campaign mode and you can play over 100h of SP without doing all, but it is clear that they want e-sport and MP on the title. CoD as well, Gear and Halo same.