By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
DonFerrari said:

An interview from MS, the type of games they release and they publicly confessing their games have been suffering from quality stand point isn't enough to convince them. They defend MS more than the executives of the company.

You seem pretty desperate to make this point, even interjecting it into replies that have nothing to do with it. What response are you looking for so I can give it to you and you can actually contribute to the thread in some capacity other than console warz jabs at other users?

You already refused to reply on if you consider Xbox mean quality games.

And you always deflect to "others" making console wars as someone on a higher ground... but is one of the users that most goes to war.

You ignore that MS truly don't focus on SP, denying their own interviews.

You deny they had been promising more studios since the start of the gen, and just got to say they have more studios after they bought them.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."