the-pi-guy said:
Not really... There are plenty of charities where the CEO is making well over a million dollars. Not exactly "cutting out the middleman". Besides that, private charities + families helping out doesn't help enough. There's a reason why Republicans and Democrats both have supported various types of welfare. The problem is that people don't realize how much those programs help.
The government spends billions of dollars researching for healthcare, space, and tons of other stuff. A lot of the drugs for example that private companies are making billions off of, actually came from the government. |
That's why we don't support those charities and find another one to support. That's the great thing about competition. Look how Xbox one dropped its price, bought more studios, created the most powerful console and restructure after people spoke up. Same thing with ps3. We can't really choose another federal government. Republicans and Democrats only support welfare because it gives them votes depending where they are running. Republicans tend to support limited welfare but won't flat out cut it because it is career suicide in some regions.
The biggest achievements in Science and health care came from the private sector. The only time Government has ever helped us greatly is with defense spending because not only do we need protection but a lot of the technology we take for granted such as the internet, GPS, microwaves, commercial flight, etc can be traced back to defense/military spending.