By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Azzanation said:
Pemalite said:

No. Reach shouldn't be included, it's not a numbered mainline entry.
It's a spin-off title that focused on only the events of Reach and not the chronicles of Master Chief's overall-arching story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_(franchise)#Spin-offs

Otherwise we should include: ODST... Otherwise it's goal post shifting in order to suit the argument to your own benefit, which is a logical fallacy.

As for Infinite, it should be the closing of the Reclaimer Saga. Aka. Halo 6. - If that changes, then yes, it should be excluded
.

I am very confused on why you wouldn't include Reach. Reach is part of the main games as its a prequel to Combat Evolve. Infinte isnt called Halo 6 and its a sequel to Halo 5.

I have no issue with including ODST into the debate however that was more an expansion pack to Halo 3 hence why its called Halo 3 ODST.

Reach has one of the biggest production values and is up there as one of the biggest in the series. Just because MS didnt slap a number on it doesnt mean its not mainline. Would you prefer if MS called it Halo 0? Either way its a mainline Halo game same as Infinite. 

Halo Reach is a spinoff, it's not a numbered entry into the main Story arc trilogies. - Halo Wars was also a Prequel.
Otherwise we should be including ODST as well.

Infinite isn't out yet, if it's not regarded as a canonical direct sequel to Halo 5, then it certainly shouldn't be included.

Halo Reach was the highest selling spin-off title in the Halo franchise, no doubt about it.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--