By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
the-pi-guy said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Is the offering of benefits, sanctuary cities and discouraging enforcment of throwing illegals not examples of enouragement? Meh... maybe Im just making assumptions...

>benefits

Illegals aren't getting massive benefits.

>sanctuary city

Are set up so that illegal immigrants can call on crime.  For example if an illegal immigrant sees someone getting murdered, they can call the police without worrying about repercussions.  

Mr Puggsly said:

You seem to have the impression I support republicans blindly. I am not registered as one.

And I'm not registered as a Democrat.  

Mr Puggsly said:

Hehe, you really believe tax hikes would only be on the rich? Thats funny, naive and not reflectice of other welfare states.

Middle class would get taxed for the healthcare, but it'd be replacing their existing healthcare costs.  

Mr Puggsly said:

California's growth has gone down significantly. People are escaping or simply not moving there in the significant numbers because its becoming a liberal shithole. I live in Arizona and I meet people who moved from blue states regularly. Its the same reason everytime why they moved, cost of living. So if you have the impression dems only wanna tax the rich...

Cost of living is so high because there literally isn't enough houses for the people in the state.  

It's not purely because taxes are high.

Mr Puggsly said:

That's the thing, dems want to little to no limit on the number of people entering while giving them all free stuff like healthcare. That literally is dealing with the world's problems. The failures of those countries is causing this illegal immigration. Yet those corrupt leaders stay in power and we are expected to pay bills of their people.

>dems want to little to no limit on the number of people 

False.  Just because dems don't think spending billions on a border wall is worth it, doesn't mean they want everyone to come over.  Most illegal immigrants aren't going to be stopped by a wall.  

Mr Puggsly said:

Its a good deal for those countries though. The remittances Mexico gets is a nice boost for their economy and a free welfare system.

Unlike the US, Mexico has a universal healthcare system.

Mr Puggsly said:

Now maybe youre thinking if they all just become citizens they can pay taxes too! But the problem is they would not generate enough tax revenue to support a welfare state unless we are all taxed heavily... like other social states. You also cant tax the rich too much or they just leave, other social states consider that as well.

Yes all those other social states with low unemployment.  

Mr Puggsly said:

Do a little research please, your ideology doesnt work.

Seeing as you:

-don't understand my ideology, shown by such beliefs as: "dems want to little to no limit on the number of people entering"

-are vastly overstating the welfare/illegal immigration problems

I would say you're the one in need of doing some research.  


In the imaginary world where 10's of million of people are illegally coming to the US, and are being given 10's of thousands of dollars just for sitting on their behinds, you are absolutely correct.  

In the real world though, there are only about 11 million illegal immigrants and that number has been consistently falling over the past 10 years.  

And they aren't being given massive amounts of money.


The biggest expense for the US is the elderly with medicare and social security.  

It's not the poor, it's not the illegal immigrants.  It is the elderly by far.  

Mr Puggsly said:

The concept of universal healthcare is nice, its just paying for it thing people won't like. We're gonna need a massive tax hike and that is going to push many millions of people out of private healthcare.

Again, what the democrats are proposing is far more ambitious and generous than what other countries provide. Especially if we have a massive number of people entering legally or otherwise.

I've gotten to a point I actually wish democrats were actually honest about what Europe or Canada actually provide, be honest who is affected by the taxes (spoiler: not just the rich) and of course admit other countries aren't as generous as democrats want to be. I also don't believe the other western countries have the same number of illegals coming in either. I assure you the democrats in the US do not want to just emulate other countries, that isn't ambitious or irresponsible enough.

>what the democrats are proposing is far more ambitious and generous than what other countries provide

How so?

Considering the size of the state there is plenty of space for housing and apartments, just look at countries that have more population in a smaller area.

Hiku said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes, man need to be so conscious to shoulder the concerns of health and unwanted babies of woman as well while woman don't need to concern about it shoving the responsibility to man. All you say just show that you put man responsibility on this much much much above woman, just missing man being the sole responsible by a thin margin.

I do hope on your life you don't expect others to take responsibility for your actions because they led you to it as if you were completely passive on it.

It's because they're the only ones that can have that procedure. Considering the risks for women with birth control, and pregnancy, it would be the more reasonable alternative.

But things are the way they are. You're right, you can't expect someone else to do it.
Though if someone suggests that all/most responsibility is on a woman, these are the reasons for why I found that particularly strange.

That and I'm white knighting all women.

Mr Puggsly said:

-Snip-

If you're talking about planned pregnancies, then I suppose I can understand the reasoning.
For unprotected sex in general, you could change the sentence to "if men who want unprotected sex got vasectomies". It's safer and more effective than birth control.

Yes as long as we accept that both are equally responsible for taking care of their interest and in the case of sex men wanting to use condom and that woman takes pill, while woman takes the pill and insist man use condom. Plus of course if you want to be a bachelor fucking all around certainly vasectomy would be a minimum.

Hiku said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Where do you get the stats from that men are mostly responsable for unprotected sex,do you assume that because you personally think it is logical or do you have a source to go to see the numbers?

It's pregnancies as a result of unprotected sex, and it should all be in my previous posts. But to summarize:
A woman can cause pregnancy ~24 days a year. A man can cause pregnancy 365 days a year.
The ones who primary push for unprotected sex are men, for obvious reasons.
And if they want to have unprotected sex, men can have vasectomies which would eliminate any unwanted pregnancies, and it doesn't come with the risks or list of nasty side effects like women's contraceptives. (Blood clots, heart/health problems, heart attack, stroke, etc.)

White knight was in reference to Rol's post.
I'll leave it to you to decide if it was a joke.

Now give me your Soul Eater.

Errr the man can't make a woman pregnant when she can't make herself, so just because male can make a woman pregnant at any time he have sex that woman would still need to be during fertile days (which isn't just 2 days a month anyway, it is about 3x as much because semen survives inside the womb). And unless you are considering odd cases of a man that have sex each day with a different woman and all of them are in fertile window and accept to do without protection but only after forcefully insistence then that would be a very odd claim from you.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."