By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HollyGamer said:
DonFerrari said:

If we are doing the right way, 4x more performance would be each component at least 4x more powerful/efficient/etc. It isn't sum or multiplying each gain. It is more likely that the worse component needs to be 4x higher.

Well i would love to see Xbox Scarlet to have 4X of Xbox One X 6 teraflop number which is 24 teraflop of GCN or in Navi number around 16 teraflop.The GPU is still stupidly expensive for console size, high power consumption and need water cooling (not just vapor chamber). If Microsoft want to have a real 4X gap performance of 6 teraflop than they need to wait until 2021 or even 2022. That's why 4X more powerful than Xbox One X is just play words to hype Xbox Scarlet , a marketing jargon to confuse consumer and fool casual people. 

Not 64. We will have a dual SOC with at least 80 CU, perhaps 112.

We don't have source to say MS was spinning or lying.

But if they were saying it's 4x more powerful because of creative math, or let's say they put something better than potato CPU that would disengenuous.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."