By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hiku said:
DonFerrari said:

We have different posting habits, but I understand your point. And obviously saying only woman are guilty is very much wrong to avoid using harsher words.

But I wouldn't be able to say that man wouldn't be more guilty than woman, even more when woman defend empowering and my body my rules, the fact that usually is woman that do pregnancy con.

So I would preffer to say that both are equally to blame, balancing the man that pressure the woman with woman that knowing  she have more to lose also should avoid entering the risk.

Both my son and daughter will be taught about how serious sex is and the consequences of the act, plus to be responsible for their own actions and what they allow others to do to them.

A pregnancy con is not an unwanted pregnancy though. And that doesn't seem to be what the other poster was referring to. But on that note, which do you think occurs more often? A woman poking holes in a condom to get pregnant, or a man pressuring/guilting a woman to have unprotected sex?

Like I said, I'm pointing this out because that's the reason why it seems extra dubious for someone to only point at women.

Pregnancy con is certainly unwanted by the male, that is the reason to con so the guy don't go away (I know a girl that done it twice to ex-boyfriend and he pays allimony but never got back to her).

Nowadays I would say more woman that have active sexual life uses pill and other methods, because often both will be on the desire and if condom isn't there possibly would keep going anyway, so I don't think it would be much more woman that get pregnant due to being forced versus male conned (in developed country). But the balancing I put had nothing to do with the pregnancy con, but between responsabilities on wanting/accepting/etc unprotected sex. For example I could, but won't, give more discount to male being more likely to not be able to brake his sexual instincts due to hormone.

So as I said when not including rape, for me both are equally responsible/guilty for what happened. And if you wish you can include some of the forced sex (because it goes on veiled threat) as rape.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."