Why can't Dems presidential hopefuls pull this much people for any of their rallys? <20,000+

[eva01beserk]

Torillian said:

eva01beserk said:

Its a middle of the road argument. Does it shock you that somebody can think a little of both is a better option? I know the left belive that if you dont agree with 100% of everything then you must be alt right. But trust me, im in the middle.

So which of  the poor's needs "like guaranteed housing, health care and food and education" can we allow them to have without taking away their desire to get out of bed? I mean all those things sound pretty essential so I'm curious. Can we give them health care and education but if they're starving and homeless they gotta figure out their shit on their own? Or do we want well-fed but uneducated populous?

Its not ala carte thing. You should not give any off them 100%. They are all important, A little help on all is what is needed. Sadly,even with help some will not have enough, but as much as that sucks doing to much will make people dependent. 

I think education is what its done best already. public schools 1-12. Takes care of basic education. Need to specialize, then there is public college that cost very little. If you have money then get a better education with private schools. With this great system some feel the need of wanting things out off their reach and get massive loans thinking is the only way and end up regretting it. But thats freedom of choice, as much as it might hurt you later on.