By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pemalite said:
DonFerrari said:

I guess that if you don't care about the 3 platform holders exclusives (very small subset of games anyway) then PC is a very competent console substitute. It have exclusive genres, better perfomance, mods and all.

That same argument can be applied to any platform though.

That is... If you don't like a platforms exclusives, but prefer the exclusives on another platform, then it makes sense to go with that other platform.
Doesn't matter if it's a Switch, 3DS, Xbox One, Playstation 4, PC, Android, iOS, SNES Classic etc' - That argument is appliable to all.

Thus there is no "best platform" there is only the best platform for your own personal tastes... That doesn't mean a platform cant have a technical advantage over another platform on a technical level as added-value incentives.

I agree, but the platform with most games, better performance and most relevant exclusive genres would be PC even if I do prefer to keep on PS because of the exclusives.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."