By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
potato_hamster said:
DonFerrari said:

When you think like an investor instead of like a gamer it makes full sense.

It sucks that people that want to play it on Switch can't, but it makes sense for EA and brings them the results they want.

Also at least on the forum I can't say there are that many Switch only users that want to buy much from EA so they aren't losing much on this (both fans and EA). We see more attacks against EA than desire to buy their games.

I'd buy Madden and NHL day one if they came out for Switch, but I know what kind of minority that makes me when it comes to Switch owners.

I'd play NHL too, you aren't alone. 

Honestly I'm just frustrated. I've posted before that it seems like EA is the only major developer to really not expand on the Switch over time....I mean there are just things out there that just frustrate me. 

I'm sure you've heard the tales of Titanfall and COD devs laughing at the idea of having their games on it, or the tale about Crash only getting ported after a single developer ported over a level over a weekend on his own time. I wish there was parity everywhere, but still you see titles from other publishers with a bit more frequency and for somewhat of a better word ambition: Activision went from Skylanders to Crash, Spyro, Diablo, and now Nitro Racing DnD. Capcom and Square are putting more titles on it, even 2K and Ubisoft put a few things on it. 

EA just seems....the exception. 

I don't know what Nintendo is supposed to do: the Switch sells well, and the titles on it clearly aren't doing horribly. Enter the Freakin' Gungeon sold a million units per official release announcement, and I'd be legitimately curious to see what VGchartz projections into 2019 would have revealed. 

Heck the projections on FIFA 19 actually had them doing better in the same span of time than FIFA 18 did, per the comments left on it here. 

I'm sure I hear the big old 'power' argument fine and all, but would a third powerbox actually be wanted, or even sell half as well as the Switch has so far even with the same 1st party library? Sales and power seem like an annoying catch 22 here. 

Be different enough to stand out when the market already has things (as opposed to chasing trends like Live Services), and you have sales but not enough power. No games. 

Be the same to run everything (....Witcher 3....) but enter a crowded market and get Battleborned...power but no sales.



The Democratic Nintendo fan....is that a paradox? I'm fond of one of the more conservative companies in the industry, but I vote Liberally and view myself that way 90% of the time?