Picko said:
disolitude said:
Picko said:
disolitude said:
Picko said:
That's not so much proof as evidence you have different preferences than a single reviewer. Who would've thought? |
Considering most people on this site pase their arguments around metacritic scores, I think this is proof enough.
|
Doesn't matter how you wish to spin it, it's not proof of anything ever.
|
Well smart guy...how is not the fact that a game that was reviewed at 3.5 is more enjoyable to me than a game that was reviewed at 10 by the same publication proof that reviews are meningless?
In what way does a reviewer speak to you and your gaming tastes when reviewing a game?
|
Because the world doesn't revolve around you. But if it did then reviews would indeed be meaningless in this case.
Of course I am assuming that the point of this thread wasn't just to say you have a different opinion to a reviewer. If that was actually the point I would've replied simply with "Duh" and left it at that.
|
So what you are saying is that the review is "right" and I am the problem for having a different opinion. Thats funny...
I wasn't talking about myself but everyone out there. You may not like GTA4 or sandbox games in general...but it got a 10...sorry its the best game for you to get.
