SpokenTruth said:
Did you miss the, yeah, you missed the part about rendering video games being a major difference from playing a video file. |
Like people really understand the difference and won't complain about paying for the subs but also having to pay for the game right?
I'm not the standard gamer, You assumed I would subs to PS+ because of MP and now you try to shove the cloud saving on the argument as if I would pay 120 USD for it (well I pay 25 for PS+ anyway).
I was replying to the points made between you and the other guy, so I didn't saw they offering 2 big games per month for free on the sub.
PS+ give another good bit of discount above the regular discount. And yes google could go Nintendo way and not give discounts at all, we can't be sure before hand.
Still I won't pay more money to have lesser performance.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







