By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KLAMarine on 04 June 2019
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
KLAMarine said:

So is the matching of tone and phrasing coincidental or deliberate?

While we can't be certain, it's more likely to be deliberate. A coincidence is a stretch given how out of character such verbiage is for the DoE and how 2 different people spoke very similarly to Trump on the same day.  I'd bet money it was coordinated between the two authors. 

"A coincidence is a stretch given how out of character such verbiage is for the DoE"

>Surely, like any other breathing human beings, DoE's employees have a sense of humor. They can entertain silly, temporary "rebrandings".

"and how 2 different people spoke very similarly to Trump on the same day."

>Spoke to Trump same day? What are you referring to?

Pemalite said:
KLAMarine said:

Okay, show me the exact moment Trump concocted the renaming to "freedom gas" and "molecules of US freedom".

I didn't assert that he did.... And it's besides the point anyway.
The point you seem to miss is that he appointed the people that did, who in turn follow trumps and the republican party guideline and stance on these kinds of issues... And thus Trump is partly to blame.

So what part of Trump's/Republican Party's guidelines dictate "freedom gas" and "molecules of US freedom" are new names for fossil fuels? Can I read up on it on GOP's website?