By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes, because the month after Netflix started operating there were 10 copycats already right? Didn't took over a decade for it to become spreading like today and will get even more spread in the near future.

Are you referring to the Netflix DVD by mail business model, or the streaming model? Because neither were original and neither took years for “copycats” to emerge. The idea for Netflix itself was the founders wanting to “copycat” Amazon.

What you’re referring to is simply the progression of technology, making it even sillier for people to whine about the potential damaging effects of EA Access.

You were one of those people making a big deal about it IIRC. If your doomsday predictions were accurate we’d have seen Ubisoft Access years ago. Plus Activision Plus. And Konami Unlimited, etc etc. Look how quick pubs are to copy other revenue streams like microtransactions and season pass and battle pass etc.

Of course the difference here is EAA is an amazing value if you’re into EA games. So basically people complaining about the service are just afraid of change. They’re the old people in the retail store yelling about how phones used to be so simple and asking why we need 4K.

Subscribe if you enjoy the games, or don’t. It doesn’t make a difference to how you experience the games currently. There’s nothing predatory about EA Access.

Making a big deal? No, making the right call out that this type of service can evolve to worse situations.

Just like the increase on streaming services (fine of you to deny that streaming have been increasing the number of services and each is losing value because of it). And the great number of exclusive shows or movies on each service have started putting people back to pirating since they won't sub to a service to watch a single show or movie. Or worse have 10 subs because they like 10 different shows one in each sub. This will be worse than cable tv real fast.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."