| Trumpstyle said: Guys some terrible news, I think navi sucks, look at this tweet:
It's 50% effiency gain with 7nm process and architectural improvements, just doing simple math we are absolutely not getting any crazy Teraflops numbers. The card AMD demoed is at best a 225watt gpu, probably 250watt and has about 10 Teraflops based on the 25% ipc gain. A $400 dollar console (PS5) need a gpu that pulls 120watt and a premium $500 console (Xbox anaconda) about 150-160watt. Both console will almost certainly be below 10 Teraflops, based on the gonzalo codenamn showing PS5 having a 1,8ghz navi gpu it will likely just have 32CU's with 2-4 disabled CU's giving 6,4-6,9TF. Xbox anaconda will probably have 40CU's but 4 disable for yield improvements so 36CU's clocked at 1,9ghz is my guess and will result in a 8,7TF gpu. Navi went from super-good to good to terrible. Look at this quote from Lisu Su at computex: "And then, when you put that together, both the architecture – the design capability – as well as the process technology, we're seeing 1.5x or higher performance per watt capability on the new Navi products" She mentions process technology!!! |
That's good news though. If they have to use a crappy GPU anyways there is more room for that 1TB crazy fast SSD of yours!
If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.







